Tullio Pinelli, 1908-2009

The possibly apocryphal story goes that Tullio Pinelli (pictured right, with Fellini and Leopoldo Trieste) met Federico Fellini at a newsstand at which they happened to be reading opposite pages of the same newspaper. Whether this is true or not, what is apparent is that Pinelli would go on to become Fellini’s longest-standing creative collaborator, outlasting even the great composer Nino Rota’s association with il maestro. Already an experienced screenwriter, in 1950 he co-wrote the screenplay for Luci del varietà [Variety Lights] with Fellini and Alberto Lattuada, soon to be followed by the poorly received Lo Sceicco bianco [The White Sheik] (1952). It would not be until their I Vitelloni (1953), co-scripted with noted writer Ennio Flaiano, that the world began to take notice of this new director’s take on cinematic language.

Pinelli would continue to work with Fellini on all of his significant films of the 1950s and 60s, though their partnership took a hiatus after 1965’s Giulietta degli spiriti [Juliet of the Spirits], in a period which saw both the director’s experimentation with LSD and his subsequent nervous breakdown. They would not collaborate again until 1986’s Ginger e Fred and the director’s final film La voce della luna [The voice of the Moon] (1990). In the meantime, he wrote the screenplays for many commedia all’italiana films with such directorial luminaries as Pietro Germi, Mario Monicelli, Dino Risi, Alberto Sordi and Vittorio De Sica, adding to his already impressive CV which could also show Antonio Pietrangeli and Roberto Rossellini as employers.

Pinelli died on March 7, 2009 in Rome.

Tags:

Fifty Years of La Dolce Vita

On a March evening in Rome some fifty years ago, Anita Ekberg and Marcello Mastroianni stepped into the cold waters of the Trevi Fountain in Rome to shoot what would become Italian director Federico Fellini’s most famous and iconic scene: Marcello and Sylvia’s watery midnight tryst, unconsummated like the majority of the relationships within La Dolce Vita, all flowing with sexual energy but ending in the clarity of the dawn light with the unfulfilment of shallow, empty hedonism. In Hollywood, the Hays Code was weakening but still in force, restricting the moral, religious and sexual content of American films; yet the influence European cinema was pushing back the boundaries of what was deemed acceptable for films to portray and communicate, which would eventually lead to the scrapping of the Code in 1968.

La Dolce Vita is important for it marks one of the important victories in this process. It was as much an artistic leap for the director; Fellini’s previous three films had perhaps examined similar themes such as religion and existential isolation, but they had still been narratively straightforward and coherently moralistic. What La Dolce Vita signalled was evident from the famous opening shot of the statue of Christ being hoisted by helicopter over the streets of Rome: here was a society freed from the constraints of religion, guilt and Original Sin, but what takes its place? The film is a freeform exploration of this brave new world, eschewing traditional forms to create an episodic, loosely-constructed mosaic of life without a god.

It is especially prescient of Fellini to presage what now seems an everyday given: the culture of the celebrity. La Dolce Vita came before Beatlemania, yet identified much of what was to come: even supplying the name to the baying press-packers who follow these lauded luminaries around – paparazzi. Marcello may well have been an idealist when he entered journalism, but these principles have long been forgotten by the time we join him on his helicopter ride over the Eternal City trying to pick up girls’ numbers above the din of the rotorblades. His most daring assignments now, save for covering supposed sightings of the Virgin Mary, seem to involve little more than escorting a buxom ‘actress’ on a tour of the Vatican and the Roman nightlife.

One aspect I have noticed of Fellini’s films from La Dolce Vita onwards is their increasing reflection of a globalised world: see where Sylvia is interviewed by journalists from all around Europe, their many different tongues appearing unitedly to question this obviously worldwide film star. Later on, languages and music from around the world seamlessly flow into one, marking at once the increasingly close-knit homogenised world emerging in the 1960s, but also rather humourously the way everyone in this superficial world is pretending to listen to one another, though not really paying any heed at all. In the grand, historically-rich surroundings of the Caracalla Baths, an Italian singer apes for his audience American rock n’ roll – the epitome of twentieth-century mass-produced mass-consumed popular culture.

Would the film make an interesting double-bill with Dr. Strangelove (1964)? Both exist in the shadow of the proliferation of nuclear weapons, but while Kubrick’s film plays a game of blackly-comic satire, Fellini takes a different path: in the face of instant global annihilation he offers his characters nihilistic debauchery as their escape, or at least diversion. The antics of Marcello’s fellow partyers are of little consequence or lasting joy, but is anything going to last anyway? Better to gain cheap thrills while there’s still a world to live in.

Perhaps I have highlighted too much of the pessimism of Fellini’s film; after all, one need only watch Pietro Germi’s hilariously comic Divorzio all’italiana (1961), which dramatises for comic effect a ravenous town of Sicilian men (and their wives) flocking to see this ‘scandalous’ new film, signalling the beginning of a new era of permissivity and sexual frankness. And for all of its dire warnings for Western society, La Dolce Vita remains immense fun to watch, like all of Fellini’s films so full of joy, and so celebratory of life’s rich diversities.

Tags:

My two cents….

If I were Oscar…

Best Film: Slumdog Millionaire
Best Director: Danny Boyle
Best Actor: Mickey Rourke
Best Actress: Angelina Jolie
Supporting Actor: Heath Ledger
Supporting Actress: Marisa Tomei
Adapted Screenplay: Slumdog Millionaire
Foreign Language Film: Waltz with Bashir

Possibly one of the easier years to predict – out of the 5 ‘best’ films of the year, only two have a realistic chance of winning, and only one is genuinely great. Where are the Best Picture nominations for The Wrestler, Wall-E and The Dark Knight (surely all better than The Reader?). Last year we had the likes of There Will Be Blood, No Country for Old Men, Away From Her, The Diving Bell and the Butterfly and even Juno bolstering a fairly strong lineup; this year there’s the mediocre likes of Doubt, Milk, Frost/Nixon and Benjamin Button clogging up the list. A poor year for mainstream film, or a terrible selection by the Academy voters? And don’t get me started on the Foreign Language section – an annual source of ire for me. At least Entre Les Murs and Waltz With Bashir sneaked in there, but no Gomorra? Must try harder next year, Oscar.

Tags:

Film of the Year 2008

1. Beş Vakit aka Times and Winds (Reha Erdem)

Why is a film set in a remote, subsistent Turkish village with a threadbare narrative my favourite film of the year? It is in the way in which it transcends its location, its characters and its events to touch on more broadly universal themes: life and death, love and hate, responsibility and neglect, fathers and sons, mothers and daughters, as well as the confusions and pains of growing up. The film’s structure, based on the five daily Muslim calls to prayer, sets the rhythms of religious ritual against the larger rhythms of the natural world – are they entirely compatible?

In some senses, the film is a piece of sheer escapism – the cinematography rapturously capturing the spectacular terrain of coastal Turkey. But to my mind what makes it special is how it frames its universal themes, without recourse to any form of closure, and uses them to allow us to reflect on our own lives, the fleeting nature of both joy and pain, and the fear of the inevitable march of time but also taking comfort in life’s natural rhymes and seasons. A slow burner, yes, but the film which most captured my heart and imagination this year, and so my Film of 2008.

The Films of 2008: Part Four

2. There Will Be Blood (Paul Thomas Anderson)

Many critics wrote off Anderson’s last feature, Punch-Drunk Love (2002), as a throwaway piece, almost a vanity project for the director to work with Adam Sandler before returning to the serious business of making another Robert Altman-inspired ensemble drama like Magnolia (1999) or Boogie Nights (1997). But if they had inspected his last film more closely, they would have seen a signpost for what was to come: what Punch-Drunk was doing was challenging the very foundations upon which modern cinema is based – playing with genre convention, narrative expectations and characterization, as well as demonstrating the director’s incredible flair for both innovative visual and sound design.

Five long years on from this, and what emerges is another such challenge, a meticulously rendered period piece, but one whose allegorical content raises what could be a simple tale of greed and corruption to the level of near-Biblical tragedy. It is the story of the coming of modern America, and so becomes a story of our oil-soaked times: the incompatibilty of unfettered and inhuman capitalism with the evangelism upon which the country was founded. Day-Lewis’ barnstorming performance has been well documented, but Paul Dano opposite him as his nemesis, preacher Eli Sunday, is just as spellbinding. The balance between the two is essential to the film: one can constantly feel the two poles of religion and greed tussling beneath a surface veneer of social respectability, each despising but also failing to comprehend the other.

And pulling everything along is Jonny Greenwood’s phenomenal score: ear-piercing violin screeches alternating with driving pizzicato rhythms, keeping the films relentless march towards its eventual denouement. I have now seen There Will Be Blood four times, and still feel entralled watching it, bemused and questioning about its cinematic language, and above all further in awe at the best director currently working in mainstream American cinema, Paul Thomas Anderson.